Legal and Ethical Risks of Using AI in Hiring

The internet is utterly packed with over-hyped information about AI. Those who venture even a couple of inches beyond surface knowledge about AI-powered technologies know that at least half of the AI hype is semi-true and pure clickbait. It’s not much different within the HR industry. The current HR and recruiting landscape is filled with talk about how AI will soon successfully automate almost all HR operations and remove all bias from the process.

But how realistic are those promises?

Most experienced HR experts will tell you that while there are numerous handy applications of AI in hiring, it’s not all that plain and simple. It never is. In fact, 77% of HR leaders displayed concerns about the accuracy and verbosity of AI recruiting, according to Gartner.

Let’s explore both the advantages and potential legal and ethical risks of using AI in hiring.

The Current State of AI in Hiring

There’s no doubt that the rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence in hiring processes has completely reshaped the landscape of talent acquisition. From candidate screening to interview scheduling, AI-driven tools provide remarkable efficiency and streamline hiring by automating traditionally manual tasks.

Typically, AI recruitment technologies promise the following key benefits:

Increased hiring accuracy
Reduced time-to-hire
Better cost efficiency

However, as we already mentioned, these advantages do come with certain risks. But more on those later on.

What are the Main Uses Of AI in Hiring?

AI recruiting tools are primarily used to automate repetitive tasks, analyze large volumes of applicant data, and improve hiring outcomes. From chatbots that engage candidates in real-time to predictive analytics that determine candidate suitability, AI is helping recruiters streamline workflows, cut costs, and reduce time-to-hire.

According to a Statista 2023 report, the top usage of AI in the recruiting process in North America was chatbots and intelligent messaging. 41% responded with job recommendations on career sites as their top AI usage, while 40% stated diversity, equity, and inclusion were among the most frequent uses of AI recruiting.

Here’s how AI optimizes each stage of the talent acquisition process:

Candidate Sourcing: By searching job boards, databases, and social media for pertinent profiles, AI-driven sourcing technologies expedite the process of finding candidates. Additionally, these solutions offer data-supported insights that assist recruiters in making well-informed choices and effectively connecting with top talent.
Candidate Screening: Resume processing is automated by AI screening algorithms, which also highlight important capabilities and possible red flags. Identifying the best candidates from a vast pool of applications expedites the selection process and minimizes manual labor.
Talent Assessment: AI-based examinations use behavioral evaluations and gamified tests to assess a candidate’s abilities, personality, and cultural fit. These tools provide a more complete picture of a candidate’s potential by producing data-driven reports on their strengths and flaws.
Candidate Interviews: AI-powered interview platforms evaluate text and video responses by analyzing facial expressions and tone to gauge engagement and fit. This saves time and offers more in-depth information on the traits of candidates.
Offer & Onboarding: AI facilitates individualized onboarding, assisting new hires in settling in and becoming acquainted with the company culture, guaranteeing a successful start to their job.

Who’s Leading the Way?

Companies like HireVue, Pymetrics, and LinkedIn have pioneered such tools, offering advanced features that leverage machine learning to assess candidate potential more objectively. For instance, Pymetrics employs neuroscience-based tests to match candidates with positions based on behavioral data, while HireVue scores interviewers using natural language processing (NLP) and emotion detection.

Recent trends in AI-driven recruitment underscore a shift towards greater customization and inclusivity. Due in large part to LinkedIn’s Talent Insights, which finds applicants with relevant talents even if they aren’t actively looking for a job, businesses are increasingly adopting AI to reach passive candidates by analyzing social media and professional networks. Adaptive AI tests that minimize bias are another example of innovation, though these systems have much room for improvement, mainly through examining candidate input and results to enhance algorithms and lower the possibility of biased behavior.

As AI adoption grows, with now 66% of companies worldwide using some form of AI, so does the demand for accountability. A number of HR tech companies, like as SAP and IBM, are making significant investments in developing “ethical AI” frameworks that seek to increase equity and lessen bias. These initiatives, which acknowledge the need to connect hiring processes with ethical and regulatory requirements, are spearheading a significant trend toward transparency in AI tools used for recruitment.

Which brings us to…

The Other Side: Legal and Ethical Risks of Using AI in Hiring

HR departments may concentrate on higher-value tasks thanks to AI recruitment technologies and their advantages. However, these benefits come with significant ethical and legal risks, particularly when it comes to

Bias
Data privacy
Accountability

Ethical concerns of AI and its use in the hiring process become worrisome when we take a closer look at some statistics. For example, 99% of Fortune 500 companies now utilize AI recruiting. However, it is reported that almost 90% of them scored poorly in using AI in hiring.

A primary concern is the risk of algorithmic bias. Even with advanced programming, AI tools trained on historical hiring data can inadvertently replicate and amplify existing biases. For instance, a recent Gallup study found that 85% of Americans are concerned about using AI in hiring, some stating that algorithms could negatively impact diversity and inclusion goals. Additionally, 49% of employed job seekers believe AI recruitment tools are more biased than their human counterparts.

There is also growing apprehension regarding data privacy, as AI often requires significant collection of personal data, raising questions about data security and compliance with regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

This clearly indicates that the legal and ethical risks of using AI in hiring are ever-present at the moment. These challenges of using AI in hiring emphasize how important it is to establish clear legal and ethical frameworks to lessen the possible drawbacks. Even though AI-powered HR solutions surely offer significant automation benefits, the need for accountability and transparency in these technologies will become essential for compliance and social responsibility in HR operations.

That said, let’s take a closer look at the more tangible pros and cons of using AI in hiring.

AI in Hiring: The Pros

The adoption of AI in hiring brings a combination of distinct benefits and serious challenges. While AI can improve efficiency and enhance candidate assessment, it also presents ethical and legal risks that organizations must navigate carefully.

Let’s first delve into the pros.

Efficiency and Cost Savings

AI streamlines repetitive tasks like resume screening and scheduling, significantly reducing recruitment timelines. According to a study by Emerald, AI can reduce the candidate shortlisting time by up to 75%. By automating processes, recruiters can focus more on strategic aspects of hiring, cutting down on operational costs.

Improved Candidate Matching

AI-powered tests assist recruiters in accurately evaluating candidates’ abilities, personalities, and cultural fit. For instance, Pymetrics uses neuroscience-based games to assess cognitive and emotional traits, matching candidates to roles that best suit their profile. Such tools claim to increase the quality of hire, as they match candidates with job requirements more accurately.

Enhanced Diversity Efforts

AI can reduce some forms of human prejudice in preliminary screening by emphasizing credentials and abilities over demographics. It can increase diversity and help businesses access a wider talent pool when set up with varied training data. Unilever, for example, adopted AI to review applicant videos without human bias, which reportedly led to a 16% increase in diversity among hires.

However, bias can be quite a dangerous double-edged sword, as explained later in this article.

AI in Hiring: The Cons

Organizations must manage complicated regulatory environments and maintain ethical hiring procedures as a result of the significant legal and ethical risks of using AI in hiring, which range from algorithmic prejudice to privacy issues.

Privacy Regulations and Data Protection

AI in hiring necessitates gathering a lot of data, including behavioral tests and resumes. Strict privacy restrictions apply to this data, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the US and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU. These regulations require businesses to manage personal data transparently and limit its use to what is absolutely necessary. In a 2024 survey, 37% of HR professionals cited data security as a top concern in AI hiring, underlining the critical need for compliant data practices.

Federal and State Employment Laws

In the United States, laws that forbid discrimination on the basis of age, gender, color, or disability are enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). AI models have the potential to unintentionally reinforce prejudices that are against federal anti-discrimination legislation since they frequently learn from prior data. Additionally, new legislation in places like Illinois and New York has mandated notification when AI is utilized in candidate evaluations, hence ensuring transparency in AI hiring tools. Noncompliance with these regulations can result in legal actions and fines.

Algorithmic Bias and Fairness

AI systems are prone to replicate biases present in training data, often disadvantageing certain demographics. Amazon’s AI hiring tool, for instance, was found to penalize resumes that included female-associated keywords, reflecting a bias against women. Such biases can undermine diversity efforts and create ethical dilemmas in hiring practices, which is why a large number of HR leaders worry about the potential for bias in AI hiring tools, emphasizing a widespread ethical concern and the need for the human touch in the process.

Transparency and Accountability

Since many AI recruiting tools operate as “black boxes,” it can be challenging to comprehend the decision-making process. Candidates’ capacity to contest potentially unfair results may be limited if they are unaware of whether or how an AI-driven procedure affected them. A dedication to openness is necessary for the ethical application of AI recruiting, which includes revealing the part AI plays in candidate assessments and offering insightful justifications for AI-driven choices. To combat this, businesses such as IBM are creating “explainable AI,” but completely transparent AI is still a work in progress.

Candidate Autonomy and Consent

Since candidates might not completely comprehend or provide their agreement with the ways in which their data is handled, the use of AI in hiring frequently raises concerns over candidate autonomy. Candidates should be informed about AI’s role in the hiring process and, if feasible, be given the opportunity to opt out. Employing companies have an ethical need to strike a balance between efficiency and candidate agency, a topic where laws are still being developed.

AI has revolutionary employment potential, but it also presents serious moral and legal issues that need to be carefully considered. In order to create hiring policies that are moral, diverse, and compliant with the law, companies must strike a balance between AI’s efficiency and open, impartial procedures.

Potential for Over-Reliance on Technology

Over-reliance on AI may result in a loss of the human element in hiring, impacting candidate experience. Certain traits that are frequently essential for jobs requiring emotional intelligence, like empathy or creativity, cannot yet be evaluated by AI. Businesses that rely too much on AI risk losing out on applicants who have spot-on potential and useful soft skills for the role but don’t meet strict algorithmic profiles.

Tips for Responsible Use of AI in Hiring

Adhering to responsible practices is essential as companies incorporate AI into their employment procedures so they can reduce ethical concerns in the workplace and legal hazards.

The following recommendations give businesses concrete actions to guarantee the ethical, open, and legal use of AI in hiring.

Regularly Audit AI Systems for Bias

Conduct frequent audits to detect and address any biases in AI algorithms. This includes analyzing training data for demographic balance and monitoring results to guarantee equitable treatment based on gender, race, and other protected groups.

According to 2023 data, 47% of HR directors believe prejudice is a major issue in AI hiring tools, underlining the importance of bias checks.

Ensure Data Privacy and Compliance

Comply with privacy regulations such as GDPR, CCPA, and other regional data protection legislation by collecting only essential information and storing it securely.

Require candidate consent for data use and notify them about how their data will be processed.

This fosters trust and eliminates potential legal issues since data protection remains a major priority for HR professionals who use AI in hiring.

Use Explainable AI Models

Choose AI models that are transparent, allowing recruiters to understand and explain how hiring decisions are made.

Explainable AI encourages accountability and allows candidates to challenge choices if necessary.

Companies such as IBM and LinkedIn are increasingly using explainable AI to minimize transparency in decision-making processes.

Provide Candidates with Opt-Out Options

Allow candidates to choose traditional evaluation methods instead of AI-driven assessments. This respects candidate autonomy while reducing potential discomfort with AI in recruiting, particularly for individuals concerned about privacy or algorithmic prejudice.

Implement AI in a Human-Augmented Framework

Use AI as a support tool rather than the primary decision-maker. Combining AI insights with human judgment reduces the risk of overreliance on technology while maintaining a human touch in applicant evaluation. According to research, combining AI with human input can improve hiring outcomes by balancing efficiency, productivity and qualitative judgment.

Train HR Teams on AI Ethics and Compliance

Educate HR personnel on AI ethics, bias identification, and legal compliance. Continuous training guarantees that employees can use AI tools ethically and identify possible ethical concerns or legal issues early on in the process.

Seek Third-Party Verification

Consider working with third-party groups to ensure the fairness and compliance of AI hiring tools. External audits from neutral sources increase credibility and assure adherence to best practices, lowering the risk of unintentional bias and legal liability.

These solutions help firms embrace AI responsibly, ensuring compliance with laws and ethical norms while harnessing AI’s benefits to improve recruitment procedures.

The Wrap-up

As AI becomes an increasingly integral part of hiring, it offers remarkable opportunities for efficiency, precision, and improved candidate matching. Yet, with these advantages come significant legal and ethical concerns and challenges, from potential biases to data privacy concerns and transparency issues.

As the Pew Research Center reports, 71% of Americans oppose the use of AI in making final hiring decisions, while only 7% favor it. This data strongly suggests that a human touch must support AI in hiring.

The proper use of AI in recruitment needs a proactive approach that includes regular audits for fairness, compliance with privacy laws, and careful integration with human monitoring.

Organizations that adopt best practices for ethical AI use can not only avoid risks but also improve their reputation as fair and trustworthy employers. Balancing creativity and accountability is critical for developing a diverse workforce and a hiring process that values each candidate’s rights and dignity.

As AI evolves, responsible employment practices will become increasingly important in connecting technology with basic values such as equity and integrity.

Ready to Lead the Future of Ethical HR?

Stay ahead of the curve with Thrivea, an HRIS tool designed to make all your HR operations as efficient as humanly possible.

Join our waitlist to be among the first to access exclusive features that will help you streamline all your HR operations using only one platform. Don’t miss your chance to shape the future of responsible HR.