by Jelena Relić
33 Most Important HR Metrics To Track and How to Do It Without Spreadsheets
Discover which HR metrics to track across every major category, what each one signals, and what it looks like when something is off, so your HR team c...
If you’ve ever had to address poor performance formally, you know the hardest part is sitting down with a blank document and figuring out what to actually write. A vague improvement plan helps no one. A well-structured one gives the underperforming employee a genuine path forward and gives the company a defensible, documented process.
In this article, I’ll give you a free, ready-to-use performance improvement plan template with a filled-in example, field-by-field instructions, and variations by role and timeline — so you can open it, adapt it, and use it today.
An effective performance improvement plan template has seven sections. Each one has a specific job. Together they bridge the gap between identifying a performance challenge and actually resolving it — for both the employee and the company.
The employee information block and signature section are straightforward: name, role, manager, dates, and signature. The sections below require thought.
This is the section most managers get wrong and the one that matters most if the PIP is ever reviewed by HR, legal, or a tribunal.
The goal is to describe a specific performance issue using observable behavior and documented results. Not opinions, character assessments, or vague performance concerns like “doesn’t seem engaged” or “has a bad attitude.” Those are unenforceable and, in a formal document, potentially discriminatory.
Every sentence in this section should be something you could prove with a record.
What to include:
Bad vs. good:
❌ “Alex has a poor attitude and doesn’t seem motivated to improve.”
✅ “Alex missed 3 of 4 project deadlines in Q3, averaging 6 days late per delivery. This falls below the performance standard for this role, which requires on-time delivery in 90% of cases. Verbal feedback was given on [date] and again on [date]. No sustained improvement in employees’ performance has been documented.”
The difference matters practically and legally. The first is an opinion. The second is a specific employee performance issue tied to evidence, a performance standard, and a prior feedback trail.
Rules for this section:
One thing most managers skip: The prior feedback log. Even two lines (“Verbal coaching on [date]: discussed missed Q2 deadlines. Written follow-up sent on [date].”) prove the PIP is a structured escalation, not a first response. Without it, the whole plan looks reactive.
If the performance issue statement defines the problem, the improvement goals define what solving it looks like. This is where most PIPs either become too vague to be useful or too ambitious to be fair.
Set a maximum of 2 to 4 measurable goals. More than that, the action plan becomes impossible to track, and signals to the underperforming employee that the plan was designed to overwhelm, not support.
Every improvement goal must be SMART:
| Element | What it means | Example |
| Specific | Describes one clear behavior or result | “Submit weekly project status reports” — not “communicate better” |
| Measurable | Has a number, frequency, or observable outcome | “Every Monday by 9 am” — not “more regularly” |
| Achievable | Realistic, given the role and timeline | Targets 80% in Month 1, 100% in Month 2 — not 100% from Day 1 |
| Relevant | Tied directly to the specific performance issue identified | Deadline management goal for a deadline management problem |
| Time-bound | Has a clear target date | “By the end of Week 4” — not “soon” |
Examples by role:
Customer support:
Operations/admin:
Sales:
Management/team lead:
One thing that separates a good PIP from a bad one: Escalating targets. Instead of demanding 100% from Day 1, set a ramp: 70% of standard in Month 1, 85% in Month 2, and 100% by Month 3.
This is fairer, more achievable, and shows the company understands that performance improvement takes time. It also makes employees’ progress visible: both sides can see movement, which keeps engagement high instead of triggering defeat.
What to avoid:
This is the section that determines whether your performance improvement plan is genuine or a formality. And it’s the section most managers rush through.
Think of action steps and resources as the employee development portion of the PIP. For every performance goal set in Section 2, there should be a corresponding answer to the question: what will actually help this person get there?
If you list improvement goals without listing support, you’re not running an improvement plan — you’re documenting a countdown. That’s unfair to the underperforming employee and legally risky for the company if the outcome is challenged.
The section has two parts:
Part 1: Employee action steps: What the employee commits to doing. Specific, dated, and directly tied to each performance goal. Examples:
Part 2: Company support: What the manager and company commit to providing.
| Resource type | What “specific” looks like | What “vague” looks like |
| Training | “Enrolled in [Course Name], access granted by [date]” | “Training will be arranged” |
| Mentorship | “Weekly 30-min session with [Name], Tuesdays at 10 am” | “Senior colleague available for questions” |
| Manager availability | “Biweekly 1:1 with agenda shared 24 hours in advance, notes documented after” | “Manager will be available as needed” |
| Tools/resources | “Access to [template/dashboard/ recording library] by [date]” | “Resources will be shared” |
One rule: for every performance goal in Section 2, there should be at least one corresponding resource in Section 3. If you can’t identify what would help the employee reach a specific goal, the root cause may not be a skill or behavior issue, and a PIP may not be the right tool.
Regular check-ins are what separate a performance plan that works from one that gets filed and forgotten. The template is the beginning, the check-ins are where actual improvement happens.
How often: biweekly for most 60–90 day plans; weekly for 30-day plans or urgent performance issues.
What each check-in should cover:
The right timeline for the improvement plan itself:
| Duration | Best for |
| 30 days | A single, clear-cut performance issue where job expectations are simple: attendance, one specific deadline behavior, or a compliance requirement |
| 60 days | Most standard employee performance issues; enough time to observe genuine behavioral change across multiple data points |
| 90 days | Performance challenges involving a skill gap, complex role expectations, or situations where unclear direction or external factors contributed to the underperformance |
Avoid setting a 30-day timeline for performance challenges that realistically require skill development. It makes the plan look punitive rather than genuine, and gives the employee almost no time to demonstrate real progress.
What to document at every check-in: a short written summary covering what was discussed, what progress was made, whether each improvement goal is on track, and what the next steps are. Both parties receive a copy. This protects the company if the outcome is disputed — and protects the employee from a retroactive rewriting of events.
This is the section most PIP templates leave blank. It’s also the most important one.
If you don’t define what success looks like before the plan starts, the outcome becomes a judgment call at the end, which is unfair to the employee and legally risky for the company.
The employee doesn’t know what they’re working toward. The manager doesn’t have an objective standard to assess against. And if escalation follows, there’s no documentation showing the performance expectations were clearly communicated upfront.
Write three scenarios, all defined before both parties sign:
The complete PIP template — including all sections with placeholder text is available as a free download in PDF format.
Download the PIP Template (PDF)
Use the guidance above to fill in each section. Get both signatures before the plan starts — not after.
Here is how a finished plan looks in practice — a specific performance improvement plan example based on a realistic scenario, with every key section filled in.
Scenario: A customer success manager has consistently missed renewal targets for three consecutive quarters, falling short of the performance standards for the role. Two prior verbal warnings have been given with no sustained change in the employee’s performance.
Performance issue statement:
Jordan has achieved 61%, 58%, and 54% of quarterly renewal targets in Q1, Q2, and Q3, respectively. The expected standard for this role is 85% of the quarterly renewal quota, a company expectation that applies to all CSMs at this level.
This specific employee performance issue has persisted across three consecutive quarters despite additional coaching. Prior verbal feedback was provided on [date]; a written summary was shared on [date]. No sustained improvement in employees’ performance has been documented.
Improvement goals:
| Performance Goal | Measurable Outcome | Target Date |
| Achieve 80% of the monthly renewal quota | CRM renewal report reviewed at each check-in | End of Month 1 |
| Conduct documented QBRs with all at-risk accounts | QBR notes logged in CRM within 24 hours of each meeting | By Week 3, then ongoing |
| Achieve 90% of the monthly renewal quota | CRM renewal report | End of Month 2 |
Action steps and resources:
Employee commits to:
Company commits to:
Check-in schedule:
| Check-in | Date | Format | Focus |
| Week 2 | [Date] | 1:1 with manager | First milestones, early blockers |
| Week 4 | [Date] | 1:1 with manager + HR | Midpoint: progress against all goals |
| Week 6 | [Date] | 1:1 with manager | Adjust if needed, confirm Month 2 targets |
| Final | [End date] | Manager + HR | Formal outcome assessment |
Outcome criteria:
Not every performance challenge is the same. These four variations adapt the standard structure to specific situations. The seven core sections remain in each; only the content, timeline, and performance expectations shift.
Use when the performance issue is clear-cut and narrow: attendance, a single recurring deadline behavior, or a specific compliance requirement. The performance gap is small, and the expected standard is simple to define.
Key adjustments:
Sample improvement goal: “Submit all weekly reports by Friday, 5 pm, for all four weeks of the plan. Zero missed submissions acceptable. Tracked via [system], reviewed every Monday.”
Use when the employee performance issue involves a skill deficit, a complex role, or situations in which unclear job expectations or external factors contributed to underperformance.
Key adjustments:
Use when in-person observation of employee performance isn’t possible, and the manager has limited visibility into day-to-day work.
Additional fields to add:
Sample goal: “Submit end-of-day status update in [project tool] by 5 pm local time, every working day. Format: tasks completed, blockers, next-day priority. No more than 2 missed updates per week.”
Use when poor performance is primarily metric-based: quota attainment, pipeline activity, and conversion rates. This is the clearest scenario for a PIP because performance standards are already quantified.
Key adjustments:
Sample measurable goals:
| Performance Goal | Metric | Target | Measured by |
| Pipeline activity | Qualified calls per week | 12+ | CRM call log |
| Pipeline volume | New deals added per month | 8+ | CRM pipeline report |
| Quota attainment | % of monthly quota | 85% Month 1, 100% Month 2 | CRM revenue report |
These are the most common PIP template mistakes I see:
A template gets the performance improvement plan started. What happens over the next 30–90 days determines whether it works.
Once a plan is active, the operational challenges begin: check-ins are missed, notes aren’t written down, progress toward improvement goals isn’t tracked consistently, and the final outcome review happens without clear documentation to support it. Most PIPs fail due to execution.
Thrivea’s Performance Management module handles this systematically:
Because Thrivea‘s performance tools run on top of Core HR, which already holds employee records, org structures, and document history, every PIP lives in full context. You always see the complete picture: past performance reviews, previous feedback, current improvement goals, and active plan status.
Start for free. Core HR is free forever. Performance Management is a paid add-on with a free trial; no credit card required. Book a demo to see how Thrivea structures the full PIP tracking process end-to-end.
An effective PIP template needs employee information, a performance issue statement, SMART improvement goals with measurable outcomes, action steps and resources, a check-in schedule to track employees’ progress, outcome criteria defining the expected standard for success, escalation, and signatures. All sections must be completed before both parties sign.
Use 30 days for a single, clear-cut performance issue. Use 60 days for most standard employee performance issues. Use 90 days when the performance gap involves a skill deficit or when a formal employee development component is needed.
Describe the specific performance issue using observable behavior and documented results, not opinions or vague performance concerns. State the performance gap, the expected standard, and what prior feedback was given. Every claim should be traceable to a date, a metric, or a record.
2 to 4 measurable goals. Each improvement goal must include a clear measurable outcome: a number, a frequency, or an observable result. More than 4 performance goals make the plan unrealistic and set the underperforming employee up to fail.
Three outcomes, all defined in the outcome criteria before the plan starts: successful completion (all performance goals met), extension (meaningful progress but goals partially unmet; plan continues with revised milestones), or escalation (performance expectations not reached despite support provided; HR reviews next steps).
by Jelena Relić
Discover which HR metrics to track across every major category, what each one signals, and what it looks like when something is off, so your HR team c...
by Jelena Relić
I’ve seen too many teams lose momentum because feedback came weeks after the moment that mattered. By then, the context is gone, and motivation fade...
by Jelena Relić
Most companies still rely on the annual performance review — a single meeting meant to summarize an entire year of work. But by the time managers si...